On Gay actors

Now this drama has been dragging along for something of a while now, and it’s beginning to stink like those left overs you keep putting off dong something with because you’re incapable of cooking for less than16 people *ahem*

So it seems there is some debate about gay actors playing straight roles. Because it’s just not realistic enough. Audiences just can’t see gay actors in a romantic lead (and, as an aside, can I give a big side eye to the fact “romantic lead” always means man/woman sexing?) It completely breaks their suspension of disbelief and they cannot believe the role.

I hate to break this to you guys. But… Orlando Bloom is not an elf pirate (alas, for the sexy combination would be incredible). Johnny Depp is not a pirate who is also investigating the Jack the Ripper murders. Daniel Radcliff is not a wizard. Alexander Skarsgarde is not a Viking vampire (but, yes he is made of sexy).

That would be because they are what we call actors. This means they *gasp* ACT. I know, complicated advanced terms aren’t they? This means that they actually play parts of people who are NOT THEM.

Because, y’know what? I find it disturbing that you are quite happy and capable to suspend disbelief enough to see Orlando Bloom as an elf, or just about anyone with some rough face make up can be an alien or can even see Taylor Laughtner as a competent actor, yet cannot possibly suspend disbelief enough to forget that an actor is gay. I find it troublesome that the fact an actor is gay overwhelms all other considerations to a degree that an audience can merrily accept elves, wizards, big blue cat aliens and even sparkling vampires in purity rings – but a gay actor being anything but gay through and through? No, that is a leap too far.

Frankly? It’s homophobic, pure and simple.

And on that note – it is clear that, depressingly, being openly gay, especially for a leading-man style actor, is a career killer. And while it is wonderful and amazing when such a person does come out – we cannot demand that of them because the cost is too high so can we stop with the heckling, the hounding and the pointless speculation. If they come out, let us celebrate, but unless they are an arsehole attacking the rest of us, don’t drag them out of the closet before they are ready to come out.

Relatedly, however, I have to say that the fact we should not heckle actors to come out, doesn’t mean the presence of out actors – or an actor’s sexuality – is irrelevant – especially when it comes to actors who play gay characters.

Many people have said that the sexuality of the actors doesn’t matter. And I raise my eyebrow and become most sarcastic I do.

Because gay actors have repeatedly said that coming out is often a career killer.

Because when John Barrowman applied for the position of Will in Will & Grace he was turned down for a straight guy because he “wasn’t gay enough.” Gay actors not only have trouble securing straight roles, but they even face barriers securing gay roles

Because far too many portrayals of us rely eternally on gross stereotyping.

Because the same people telling us that the sexuality of the actors playing gay characters doesn’t matter are also turning round and being (rightly) outraged at the white cast of Avatar: the Last Airbender film and don’t seem to see any conflict in this.

Because I think under-represented minorities really should have the chance to tell their own stories and represent themselves rather than have straight people fill the role. And I think that’s doubly, trebly the case when we’re considered unsuitable to represent most roles

So yes, it does matter. Yes an actor’s sexuality is relevant and I dislike the amount of straight handwaving we’re having over the issue. Yes you don’t have a right to Out an actor or demand an actor outs themselves – but that does not make the existence of out actors irrelevant.

And finally – if an actor identifies as straight or declines to answer that question but plays the roles of gay characters  – that does not make them gay. And it’s homophobic to assume a straight actor playing gay roles is closeted. Because to say that you are saying that only gay people would ever want to play our role.

You are saying that playing a GBLT person is just too abhorrent for straight people. You are saying there’s nothing in a gay role that would appeal to straight people. Because gay characters can’t be deep and interesting and worthy of straight people’s attentions and be a professional challenge to portray? It’s insulting and, again, homophobic

Just as Orlando Bloom doesn’t have to be an elf to play Legolas, nor does him playing Legolas mean he is secretly an elf. Just because an actor plays a gay role doesn’t make them gay. It’s called acting.

There, did I miss anything? Probably, but it was a good ramble. And there’s such a trainwreck of fail to address here

8 thoughts on “On Gay actors

  1. Daniel Radcliffe is not a wizard. Alexander Skarsgarde is not a Viking vampire

    BULLSHIT! Harry Potter plays Daniel Radcliffe!

    And Alexander Skarsgard is indeed a Viking and a vampire. I saw it in the Geneva convention. Look it up.

    It was bad enough you told me that Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy aren’t real (and everyone knows they are), but this is getting fucking ridiculous.

  2. BUT IT WOULD BE SOOOOOOOOOOOOOO MUCH EASIER IF GAYS WERE JUST HONEST WITH THEMSELVES AND WERE OUT AND PROUD.

    THEY WOULD MAKE IT BETTER FOR ALL GAYS EVERYWHERE!!!!!!!

    /sarcasm

    • Don’t you know all diswcriminatioon just DISAPPEARS if you’re open just like… oh… absolutely no other form of discrimination in the world ever!

      But it’s not like there are gay “leading men” style actors out there who have has career troubles, right Rupert? Mr. Everett? Oh…

      I just wonder what kind of box these people live in, because they’ve got an amazing disconnect between themselves and the real world

  3. When Will Young did a drama series in which he played a straight character I remember the Daily Wail had this article which seemed to be obsessed with the idea of him playing a straight role. It was all rather ridiculous the way it focused far more on his sexuality and not on his acting talent and proposed the preposterous notion that it would be shocking for people to see an out gay man in a love scene with a woman.

    They do it time and time again, if an openly gay or lesbian actor, gets cast in a straight role, the masses start flailing and complaining about how unrealistic it is. They want gay people typecast, whereas straight actors are considered brave and heroic for daring to tackle non-straight roles. It’s such a sickening double-standard.

    I think there’s far too much interest in actor’s personal lives. They don’t owe the public anything.

    • Aaartgh the Daily Heil! *performs quick exorcism on the computer* vile vile vile VILE rag *shudder*

      It’s the limits of suspension of disbelief. Elves, orcs, aliens from mars – but teh gay playing a straight character? NOOOOO! IT CANNOT BEEEE! It just shows how overwhelming GBLTness is to these bigots that it overrules everything else

      And I just looove how brave straight actors are for… uuuh pretending to be us? Yeah I applaud such courage I really do!

  4. As always, it feels like applying one’s head to a wall when this kind of illogical argument comes up. Actors act, it’s what they’re paid to do, so it should not matter what their sexuality (or ethnicity or religion I should add as well) is.

    Neil Patrick Harris is gay, and yet on How I Met Your Mother he plays a straight bro-tastic dude who lives by the code of his own copy of Bros Before Hoes, and plays that character so well that I can’t stand him and have barely seen more than 2 episodes. It has nothing to do with Neil Patrick Harris being gay but with his character, and he’s great at it. It takes a special kind of skill to get people to detest a character so deeply, yet I’m also aware that he’s acting.

    John Borrowman’s encounter at the Will & Grace show always comes up, as it should because the only kind of gay that seems to be allowed in most widely distributed television is the gay stereotype. The other side of it that seems to be allowed are lesbians, and that’s only for the straight ale gaze rather than portraying actual three-dimensional characters.

    It is homophobic without the use of normal homophobic slurs that we’re all used to, and an enforcement of the straight ‘normalcy’ that’s been pushed since… well, forever.

This blog is strictly moderated. Failure to honor the spirit of this space and the guidelines set forth in the "Before you Comment" and "Act Like You Got Home Training" sections will result in your comment being spammed and trashed, and you banned. This is not negotiable.

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s