Mother and Maiden: Pregnancy and Abortion

We can all agree, I think, that a woman’s reproductive choices and freedom belong to her and her alone, and that she has total autonomy over her body.

Why, then, is it so rare to find a woman in fiction who:

1) has had an abortion
2) is completely okay with the fact?

(Warning: possible rape, abuse and sexual assault triggers.)

Abortion by itself isn’t uncommon in fiction; every now and again it rears up to boost drama, but I can count on one hand, in fact at the moment of writing this I can count one such instance, the times I’ve encountered female characters who walk away from an abortion with a spring in their steps and a song in their hearts. Instead most of them suffer ever after. They wallow in guilt and self-loathing. They are traumatized and every time they see another woman with a child, they look on with bitter envy. Rape or abuse survivors? Better keep the fetus. It shows you’re strong and worthy of healing and approval; get rid of the fetus and well, you’re just a worthless demon-bitch-whore, aren’t you? No really, that’s the case for almost all instances I’ve encountered: carrying the pregnancy to term is seen as a signal that the woman is a fantastically tough individual—and it can be, true, but the alternative is simply not considered. Abortion is seen as “taking your hatred of the rapist on an innocent unborn child” (see Now and Then, Here and There). Women get reproductive choices, but only as long as the choice is “keep the baby.”

This is Hinako Aikawa from the manga Bitter Virgin. Spoilers: she spends the entire series haunted by the guilt of having had an abortion and having put up the baby for adoption the second time her stepfather impregnates her. Whenever she encounters a mother or a baby, she looks on tragically wondering what the baby she never got to raise might have been like. The kicker? She carried the baby to term the second time because the doctor informs her that if she aborts, she’ll never be able to bear children again in the future.

Which she really wants to, of course. All women are maternal by instinct. Everyone wants a baby. It’s our natural role and anyone who deviates from this either doesn’t exist or is a psychopath. Joan D. Vinge’s The Summer Queen, while otherwise female-positive, falls into the same trap: every single female character in it wants to be a mother. One of them, Jerusha, repeatedly miscarries and is devastated over this. Once a policewoman, she had to contend with an extremely sexist work environment:

She had spent years trying to force [her male colleagues] to accept her as a human being instead of a woman, and all it had done was turn her into a man. In leaving the force, she had believed she was reaffirming her humanity. She wasn’t a man… but now when she wanted to be a woman, she couldn’t be that either.

Yeah, not having kids makes you less than a woman. I’m not even sure what “turn her into a man” is about, because Jerusha in The Snow Queen was a competent, hard-boiled policewoman who always had to talk some sense in her younger colleague. This passage is followed by a conversation between Jerusha and her husband Miroe, who tells her to use contraceptives seeing that the miscarriages are going to be the death of her. She wants to keep trying—“I’m forty-three, I don’t have much longer,” she insists (her bio-clock is ticking!). He ends the exchange by telling her that if she doesn’t agree to use the “childbane,” he’s not going to have sex with her anymore.

Twenty kinds of fucked up.

Tellingly, the only woman in the Snow Queen Cycle who doesn’t have or want to have children is portrayed as cold and ruthless, and ends up being thrown into the sea: Arianrhod has herself cloned, but only as part of her scheme to retain power—a scheme that’s portrayed quite sympathetically, admittedly (up to the part where she plans the genocide of half her planet’s population), but out of all women in these books Arianrhod is furthest along the black end of the morality scale. She also doesn’t have much of a maternal instinct, seduces her clone’s lover, and makes it clear that if her clone doesn’t want to join her in power then she can quite literally take a leap. Joan D. Vinge is considered a feminist writer, if you were wondering.1 Which yes, I suppose she is, but…

[1]: and honestly, I’m still really fond of the Snow Queen Cycle—it contains a lot of positive relationships between women, and women being the movers and shakers of the world, and women empowering one another. But on reflection and close examination, some of the things in them are horribly off. Like the “Indians purposefully keep a planet of Caucasoids technologically inferior so they, the Indians, can exploit and oppress said planet” plot. That’s Indians as in people from India, for those playing at home.

I want to be clear: I’m not saying that women who don’t abort are failing their duties to fight against patriarchy or any such silly thing, or that women who decide to keep children in the event of abuse and sexual assault are wrong—I’d never ever suggest such a thing—but I find it troubling that “keep the baby” is often presented as the only possible choice, that good girls avoid abortion (and consequently only evil girls and bitch-demon-whores from hell take the option), and that all other options—adoption or otherwise—are either invalid or will traumatize you for life, because rejecting motherhood is a Bad Thing that women should never ever do. And that’s not an okay message to get across. Not okay at all.

Fertility as a Weakness to Exploit

Pregnancy is one of the things that is, as far as media representation is concerned, unique to women: I rarely see it handled in any way other than this, apart from the rare cases of male pregnancy being played for laughs, and trans folks are elided entirely. And because we live in a patriarchal world, pregnancy is used to reduce, marginalize and weaken women.

Hands up. Seen any of these lately? I bet you have; “my mom died giving me birth” is like one of the most overused character backgrounds known to man. How about this one? It’s practically required to throw in a pregnant woman in a hostage situation because that makes it extra scary or something. But I’m here to discuss something that’s a little less obvious: pregnancy as an exploitable weakness.

The Basanos is a sentient, incredibly powerful tarot deck from the Vertigo comic Lucifer. They can see the future. They have many plans. One of them is to breed the next generation, and they do this by raping the woman they’ve been using as a host, Jill Presto. Much of Jill’s subplot is taken up with her pregnancy; many beings of great power are concerned over what she will give birth to, and she fights nail and tooth to get rid of her pregnancy. She manages to abort one of the twin fetuses with much vindication and no regrets (hooray!). In Richelle Mead’s Dark Swan paranormal romance series, the protagonist Eugenie Markham is the daughter of Storm King and it is prophesied that a son born of her womb will conquer the human world. Subsequently she spends much of her time fending off would-be rapists. Laurell K. Hamilton’s Merry Gentry series revolves around the idea that the protagonist, fairy princess Meredith, must race to conceive a child before her cousin does in order to inherit the Unseelie throne: initially not because she wants to be queen, but because taking the throne is the only way for her to stay alive.

In all of these stories, the woman is not entirely reduced to her uterus, but they certainly spend an awful lot of time being regarded as, or indeed being, breeding apparatuses; it’s problematic in the same way that defining women as “mother/maiden/crone” is. It’s not quite as all-out awful as the Broodmothers from Dragon Age and the rape isn’t the crux of my argument—though in many cases rape is certainly part and parcel with the deal—but it’s getting there. Eugenie Markham does indeed get kidnapped and raped in the series, and though she doesn’t get pregnant the rape was partly due to the prophecy associated with her uterus. Later on, when she does conceive through consensual sex with a partner she enjoys, it instantly becomes a wedge between them. The father, aware of the prophecy and entirely protective of the human world, pokes and prods and urges her to abort (“You promised!”). But because we live in a world where all women must be mothers or they are Bad Girls, she hears the heartbeats of her twin fetuses (what is it with twins? Merry Gentry has freaking triplets) and instantly decides that it’s worth risking the prophecy after all. Women, man, we all go mushy at the thought of babies.

At this point, it all goes to hell. The father decides Eugenie must die and, though she is otherwise a ridiculously powerful shaman and half-fairy capable of defeating centuries-old elven kings, she finds herself on this occasion curiously depowered and flees to seek the aid of her other lover.

Funny how pregnancy takes away all your capabilities and puts your fate in the hands of men, eh?

Even Jill Presto, who comes out of this much better than either Merry or Eugenie, ends up saddled with a Basanos offspring who has every intention of murdering Jill as she comes out. There are a few complicated things that happen after that, but toward the end when the new god of the cosmos, Elaine, tries to give everyone a happy ending, she hands Jill this:

It doesn’t occur to Elaine to give Jill a clean slate or even simply leaving Jill as is. No. Rather than entirely erasing the rape—which objectively did happen, it’s only Jill’s memory that is removed—she decides, well, better keep Jill pregnant. Whether or not she wants to. It bears mentioning that Noema has already been born once, and emerges from the womb a sentient and powerful entity. She’s also under threat from, among others, Lucifer’s wrath and flees from this: Jill doesn’t so much as bat an eyelash or attempt to protect her daughter. She made a truce with Noema, but there’s not much of a relationship here and Jill doesn’t give a damn when Noema disappears.

Once the circumstance has been rewritten and Noema is born the second time (sans her previous personality and powers), Jill does turn out to be a good mom, but prior to the rape she never expressed interest in motherhood; was, if anything, focused on making a career for herself and didn’t feel the least bit deprived for not having a husband or a kid. It wasn’t a “career woman is sad and bitter she doesn’t have time for a family” cliche by any means. So it’s more than a little odd, more than a little random, that when Elaine presses motherhood on her (without her knowledge) she turns out perfectly happy with it. Conveniently, an old flame turns up not long after she’s given birth, so she doesn’t even get to stay a single mother for more than a few months.

Pregnancy in fiction, then, is like sexual assault in that it is a vulnerability exclusive to women (gay men get their share of rape but, obviously, not pregnancy): it’s something used to weigh a woman down, take away her power, and moreover forces her to become dependent. And because writers don’t really like the idea of women’s autonomy over their own bodies, they take away the choice of abortion or adoption, or make them evil, horrible things that are only done by evil, horrible people (or else traumatic to good people). While this is probably empowering to women who decide to keep the fetus, or women who are inclined to motherhood, it does so at the expense of women who don’t and aren’t when this doesn’t necessarily have to be the case: media are varied enough, numerous enough, that both can be represented equally positively–as indeed they should be, because they are all valid choices.

45 thoughts on “Mother and Maiden: Pregnancy and Abortion

    • Oh wow, that’s way, way more real and nuanced than what I wrote. I never even knew people expect women who donate/sell ova to… feel traumatized. I mean yeah the process is probably not fun and certainly it could be traumatic to many women, but why would they… it’s not… I don’t get it, wtf. Melissa Hafsky sounds like a fucking terrible person. Policing people’s reactions now, are we?

      • Same dynamic, I think. I was reminded of it because the same kind of emotional bullying happens towards women who have had abortions, so it doesn’t surprise me in the least that you don’t see women in fiction ever having an easy time with their abortions.

  1. I don’t have much to contribute to this, besides my utter agreement with your argument.

    I think most women feel something after an abortion (probably because pregnancy hormones are chaotic, because of any emotional stuff surrounding the nature of the pregnancy, etc), but there’s a critical difference between some emotional instability for a little while, and grieving to the point of difficulty functioning. One of those things does not define the woman, it’s just part of her full life for a while. The way that abortion in fiction is almost always the disastrous grieving end of the scale is, as you say, very problematic.

    Oh, and I think I would also like to nitpick describing “career woman is sad she can’t have a family” as a cliche, because this is a genuine problem faced by a number of career woman, due to the way that the business world is not supportive of a parent (both fathers and mothers) wanting to balance full-time work and child-raising. If both parents want to work, other family members or nannies have to be brought in, which isn’t possible for all parents. Things like on-site creches and flexible working hours would go a LONG way to helping parents who all want to work. Women who feel sad and bitter about this aren’t cliches; they’re real and their sadness is not something to dismiss. It is just, as you say, when this is the ONLY way that career women are depicted that it gets problematic – career women have a lot of views about having or not having children, none of which make them bad people.

    • Yep pretty much, sorry I wasn’t clear with the phrasing–it’s just troubling that lots of career women in fiction are portrayed in that exact way and little else: “Nooo I can’t have a man and kids, my life is FOREVER ALONE and bitter.” It reinforces the idea that all women need the husband-and-kids deal or else can’t possibly ever be happy.

    • I was going to post something very similar to what you said, but you said it better.

      Something else along these same lines that I would like to see, and almost never do, is the woman who gives away her baby for adoption (or ova — like the post Rania linked to — or fetus, whatever) and doesn’t stress about it and Always Regret The Missed Opportunity to Be a Mommy Forever (or until Reunited with Child). The only examples I can think of are the movie Juno and the book Ethan of Athos.

  2. I think Elaine’s origins may have influenced what she did to Jill. Which doesn’t mean that she wasn’t utterly and completely wrong. But Elaine, being a mystical child, conceived of rape, was clearly biased.

    I’ve actually read a number of books where men have been raped and fallen pregnant. Of course it’s not entirely common in published fiction, it’s treated entirely differently, it does exist and whenever I’ve encountered it I have started to yell WTF???

    There’s one story, in either Sword and Sorceress, or Chicks in Chainmail whereupon a bunch of soldiers come across a city, they rape the women and they loot it. Then these women warriors attack the men, and the men think they’re having sex, only no, the children they conceived, on the women they raped, are then transferred into the men, who’re then forced to raise the children. And of course having children transforms the men, makes them into better people. Well apart from those that kill themselves. And this has happened before, and the women clearly have the skills to defend themselves, so why are they letting the men rape them in the first place?

    I can’t think of any examples in fantasy that fits your criteria. Even books, where female characters have known they’re carrying the anti-christ, fathered by some monstrous being, the women have chosen to keep the child. Even if giving birth to the child will kill the mother, they will keep the child. Because children are magical and special, even those who’ve not been born yet and everyone knows that women are only good to have babies.

    I don’t read mainstream fiction. I have seen it done on mainstream television. (Of course I’m in the UK so that might be the difference).

    • That and Elaine is, as a friend pointed out to me, essentially still a teenager. Though I’d argue that taking Noema’s powers away was basically erasing Noema’s identity anyway, so why not just erase her entirely or having her reincarnate as someone else’s kid but… yeah, well, Elaine. I’m fond of her as a character, honest, but some of the things she do are unfortunate.

      Then these women warriors attack the men, and the men think they’re having sex, only no, the children they conceived, on the women they raped, are then transferred into the men, who’re then forced to raise the children. And of course having children transforms the men, makes them into better people. Well apart from those that kill themselves. And this has happened before, and the women clearly have the skills to defend themselves, so why are they letting the men rape them in the first place?

      WTF?

      I… what?

      I’m not even sure how to parse this thing. My brain’s broken now. This is a whole new level of “this is about men, haha”, i.e. women are responsible for teaching and bettering men’s moral characters.

      Because children are magical and special, even those who’ve not been born yet and everyone knows that women are only good to have babies.

      God yes, so many writers are hideously pro-life it’s scary, even though they don’t mean to be–even if they profess to be feminist.

      • I enjoyed Lucifer and I do like Elaine as a character as a character as well and I do agree, she did some unfortunate things.

        I read the weirdest of books and short stories sometimes.

        It’s strange, I have a huge stack of fantasy short-fiction which I’ve just finished rereading, all about women. While I can think of a number of stories of women who were pregnant, or had children that they initially didn’t want, but had the children and discovered that they loved them.

        The only ones that didn’t love the children are the wicked stepmothers. Of course it’s perfectly reasonable for men not to love their children. Women are made for the babies, all that other stuff they do, that’s just filling in time before they can fulfill their true purpose in life. Babies are the most important thing ever! That’s why all fairytales end with the woman getting married and living happily babies ever after.

        I must have read something where that’s not the case. I just can’t think of anything.

  3. I’am going to say this once, Abortion is murder, period. I can’t answer for rape victims, but if you don’t want the child just use condoms or not have sex at all. When that sperm and the egg merge they create life. Yes a woman can choose, but she is in fact killing a life who has not seen the outside world and not giving the child a chance in life. Also in fiction this subject should not be played around with. At all. This is a very sensitive subject for both Pro-life and Pro-Choice

    • I’m going to say this once: you don’t appear to understand nuance or many of the ideas central to feminism. Sorry, abortion isn’t murder and more options should be open for women who seek it; more media should devote time and attention to portraying the choice of abortion positively, because that is what many women need. Our bodies belong to us. We control them. The end. Simple.

      Just for you, I think I’m going to go write a short story about a woman who aborts simply because she doesn’t want a child and wishes to retain her bodily autonomy. No other reason. Not medical complication, not because she can’t afford motherhood, not because she’s been raped. Then afterward she goes right on to have sex with as many lovers of her choice as she likes, because she enjoys sex. Condoms may or may not be used but hey, if they break there’s always the morning-after pill. Spike that shit right in the womb, oh yes. Death to fetuses!

      • We’ve a soap here, on at 6:30pm on one of the 4 main channels, aimed at the teens and twenties market, which has actually done stories like that.

        There’s one woman, who loves sex, who fell pregnant, was begged by her sister (who can’t have kids) to keep the baby, the sister promised to raise the child. Now, a baby wasn’t going to negatively impact on the woman’s career, or on her education, she hadn’t been raped, she’d no real health concerns, over it. She could just have the baby and hand it over to her sister without needing to worry about anything else. She chose to have an abortion, went back to her party life-style, continuing to love sex and have it with numerous men, and while I was watching the show she never once regretted it.

        There was another, same show, who was pregnant with her dead boyfriend’s baby but knew that a baby would impact on her education and that she just wasn’t ready for raising a child. But it was the last link of her boyfriend for his family! She went had an abortion, never regretted it, finished her education, got married and had a baby.

        Actually the soap’s had a number of women having abortions and not being crippled by the decision to do so. It’s also had those decide against having abortions. Then various degrees along the scale of their emotional reactions to their decisions.

        Mostly I’m mentioning it since it seems as if there’s sometimes vast differences in the media on this side of the pond and the other.

    • The problem with that is many stores reserve the right not to sell contraceptives to women and many practice this. More than that but with Planned Parenthood being under attack (they also provide sex ed, STD testing, prenatal healthcare, as well as contraceptives). You know the very things that would prevent the need for abortions. It’s becoming more clear that for a lot of people it isn’t about the welfare of the child, but controlling a woman’s body.

      • Exactly. It’s not about concern for the children (who often cease to matter once they’re born). It’s about controlling women and controlling access to women’s bodies.

      • A Welfare of a child (fetus or newborn) should always take priority. Children are the greatest gift that God gave to humans. It’s sad that things turn out they way they do.

      • Wait, holy shit. I completely forgot about this abortion-is-murder comment. Is that who Jarronnelums/Javon Nelums is?

        • You should probably also be aware of this: http://sf-drama.livejournal.com/3270381.html?thread=615975917#t615975917
          There’s more bullshit in the full thread (telling women what they should and shouldn’t find sexist, deciding to lecture people on Japanese history because he wrote a paper on it in high school, calling a woman crazy for daring to find something misogynist, etc).

          Even if the “Javan” who commented here isn’t the same person as jarronnelums, jnelums1988 made the same post to his lj about Tower Prep. So the guy making an ass of himself in sf_drama is definitely the same guy who made the most recent post here.

          • Wow, I didn’t see that since I stopped following that post after a while.

            Not enough gross in the world; out-and-out homophobia too on top of everything else. What the fuck? Banning him from my WP, lol.

          • MOD NOTE: Please do not drag stuff from other communities to Ars Marginal. As long as people abide by the rules and act like they have home training, they can participate or contribute at Ars Marginal.

  4. one of the things that was somewhat surprising (in a good way) is that when family guy covered abortion they actually chose to go through with the abortion and the woman in question (Lois) is perfectly fine the very next episode. needless to say fox was none to pleased about it.

  5. Abortion is kind of iffy for me. I fully believe that women should have the right to choose it or not.

    However I still find the concept of abortion itself somewhat tasteless no matter how much I try too.

    Also I hear that third trimester abortions are a sore debate point so I was wondering what the op thought

    • Third-trimester abortions are brought up time and time again as an argument against abortion, often in order to derail discussions. If you’re that interested in the subject go google it.

      The amount of abortions performed in the third trimester are minuscule and the reasons for them are almost always to protect the mother’s life, health, or because the pregnancy is non-viable.

    • However I still find the concept of abortion itself somewhat tasteless no matter how much I try too.

      Do you have a uterus? If not, why do you think your views on abortion are relevant in any way, shape, or form?

  6. Not fantasy, but in season 4 of Friday Night Lights, a high school sophomore gets pregnant due with a guy she barely knows. She’s not from a great family life, and she’s a little insecure, but she is a good person–a sympathetic and significant character in the last two seasons of the show. She plans to get an abortion. The boy acknowledges it isn’t his decision and is willing to pay half the cost, but wants the girl to think about it first, since it’s a big deal. The girl seeks out the advice of her best friend, who takes her to talk to the coach’s wife, who is also a high school principal. The principal is very careful and just answers questions and encourages the girl to talk to her mother. The girl does, and her mother REALLY wants her to get an abortion, largely because the mother doesn’t want her daughter to repeat her own unsatisfying, unsuccessful life. The daughter gets the abortion.

    The boy’s very pro-life mother finds out about it, learns that the girl talked to the principal, and sets out on a campaign to get the principal fired (she is rather kind to the girl, maybe because she’s looking for an adult scapegoat). She eventually succeeds, largely because the principal can’t stand to compromise her integrity and give a fauxpology to the whole town. The principal is willingly demoted back to her old job of guidance counselor, but over at the other high school on the tough side of town.

    The issue is then over for the girl, who goes on to have other story arcs that have nothing to do with the abortion. In season 5, she starts dating the boy who knocked her up, who is actually really into her. The person who paid the real consequence was the principal who did everything right. Of course, she ended up getting a pretty decent resolution, the demotion to her more fulfilling prior career.

    So, there’s one example from mainstream TV.

      • family guy has the mother lois choosing to go through an abortion and being fine (though fox was not to pleased about it).

    • And I just remembered last night… Claire on Six Feet Under had an abortion in Season 3 or 4 – can’t remember which. Her boyfriend was pissed that he wasn’t consulted, but then he later slept with their male, bi art professor. Claire had a few reasons to dump him, and so she did. I don’t recall the abortion coming up again.

  7. I agree with this post. I disagree with your stance on abortion, but the fact of the matter is, this is something that goes unexamined. Whether or not I disagree with you, you exist and there are many, many, many more who share your point of view. Why aren’t these people represented in media? Why is it that pregnancy automatically seems to render women helpless (or being grabbed on the elbow for that matter)? Why is it that all women seem to crave raising a family? That animal instinct to spawn more offspring is something we should not be slaves to, or define our identities by (gender identity or otherwise), just as with most any human instinct. We’re intelligent creatures, and we can have goals beyond producing offspring, especially in an age where the range of accomplishments we can have to our name is so much greater.

    Female characters shouldn’t be made weak because they have a womb, they shouldn’t be made into caricatures to fit societal expectations, and they shouldn’t be made into stereotypes because it’s convenient.

    This isn’t to say that some people aren’t like this (I know at least one person whose highest goal in life is to settle down and raise a family), but when the goal of every female character seems to be “Raise a family”, “Be heroic and independent until Mr. Right falls into my lap and then sacrifice everything to support him because he’s the most special, important thing in my life even though I met him yesterday”, or some combination of the two, it gets quite old.

    • See this, everyone? This is how you disagree with a position while still acting like you got home training! All you have to do is acknowledge and validate where someone is coming from without acting like that person needs to be unintelligent, malicious, or delusional to have their point of view. Told ya it ain’t rocket science!

  8. This is a really good article, but…

    “Pregnancy is something that is unique to women”

    WTF? Really? I’m most certainly not a woman and I’ve been pregnant and had an abortion. This is really erasing to trans* people as a statement. I know plenty of non-women out there who’ve been pregnant. Pregnancy is not a women’s issue, pregnancy is a uterus haver’s issue, conflating gender identity with biology is really unenlightened.

    • I was thinking mostly of portrayals in media, but I realize it comes across as though I’m saying this of real life. My apologies. Would you like me to edit that out, or clarify in the article?

      • A clarification would be lovely, ^_^. I appreciate it. Speaking of media portrayals, it would be really interesting to see media with trans* characters tackling pregnancy as an issue (not in a freak show way, obviously).

        • Again, sorry for such an absolute-sounding statement. I’m cis, so it’s obviously done from a place of privilege too, which makes it doubly shite and thoughtless. Er, it appears I can no longer edit my own articles though so that’s… hairy. Do you have an e-mail I can contact you with?

          I don’t think I’ve ever seen pregnancy come up for fictional trans* characters, but then again I can count trans* characters on one hand–and the majority of them are assigned male at birth, hence no issue of uterus. The only remotely positive trans* character I can think off of the top of my head is from Sandman, and she ends up, well… dead. :/

          • my email is glittertrashwhore@gmail.com

            I know I’ve written fanfic about Grell (from the anime/manga black butler) dealing with the fact that she got her lover pregnant (Grell is a trans woman). Admittedly, Grell is a villain (and quite problematic in some ways) but I do quite love her.

  9. So, interesting thing I read a long time ago while I was doing all that reading I do because I read a lot: The popular misapprehension about abortion guilt is, in fact, a misapprehension–the majority of women (in a … Spanish-speaking community in Mexico? I really need to figure out what book of essays it was I was reading so I can source it properly) polled would rather that the circumstances (personal health, unplanned pregnancy, pregnancy out of wedlock, family planning–anything you can think of) hadn’t required an abortion, but didn’t have any form of guilt associated with it. The authors did not, from what I remember, expand on this to say whether that meant “were able to carry the pregnancy to term” or “no pregnancy had occurred” but it is not really germane to the discussion.

    Personally, I am “it would be really awesome if we could reduce the number of abortions because they’re not fun for anyone involved, but denying anyone access to them is of no use at all so don’t do that it just gets people hurt and killed”. Better sex education to vastly reduce accidental conceptions, much improved treatment of pregnant individuals–because we did ourselves a disservice by effectively freezing our evolution where we did with the cervix not quite being big enough for an infant’s giant brainy head–that includes pregnancy benefits and support in school and the workplace. (And “pro-life means the life of the childbearer and all presently born members of their family, too”. I am basically sympathetic to both sides of the argument but to pro-lifers: you cannot legislate morality, and [tl;dr ethics argument no one on this site needs to hear].)

    Lois McMaster Bujold wrote a very interesting subplot to her Shards of Honor duology (which had a lot of stuff on the future of reproductive health) that also involved returning all the fetuses to the rapists. When a number of prisoners-of-war were returned to their home government pregnant due to multiple rapes, that home government packaged up all the resulting fetuses in embryonic incubators and sent them right back to their fathers’ government to be raised (or…not) on that dime. It helped that the receiving government, while hideously paternalistic and not particularly interested in the rights of women, was very queasy over the idea of getting rid of unborn babies (something founded in their historic difficulty with breeding, which–well). You get the idea.

Only those with home training are encouraged to reply. Failure to exhibit home training may result in getting mocked, cussed out and/or banned.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s